VerityLaw Functionality Gap Map
Traceability page mapping current VerityLaw manuals to live dashboard and portal surfaces, partial workflows, and backlog items that are not yet fully implemented.
Checking What Is Live, Partial, or Still Missing
This page helps you tell the difference between current product truth and future scope so the docs do not lie.
Product: VerityLaw
Module: Reference and Traceability
Role: Any user, support, QA, documentation author
Difficulty: Intermediate
Time: 5 minutes
Last Updated: 2026-03-10
Version: Current repo baseline
Before You Start
- Use this page when you need a status answer, not a task walkthrough.
- Be ready to compare the route map with the requirement register.
What is this page?
This is the manual honesty page. It maps the current help set to what is live, what is partial, and what is still missing.
When do you use this?
Use this page before promising a feature to a user, when writing or reviewing docs, or when a requirement in feedback or backlog material sounds richer than the screen in front of you.
Where does the status come from?
This page is grounded in:
- the current
/dashboardand/portalroutes - the VerityLaw functional register
- the existing help pages
How to use this page
- Find the workflow area below.
- Check whether it is marked
live,partial,live to partial,constraint, ormissing. - If it is
missing, do not turn it into a fake SOP. - If it is
partial, document only what users can truly do now.
Coverage map
| Manual area | Current surface | Build status | Documentation rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| practice core: dashboard, clients, cases, documents | live dashboard pages | live | document as normal workflow |
| finance core: billing, time entries, trust | live dashboard pages | live | document as normal workflow |
| contracts core: contracts, repository, obligations, negotiations, playbook | live dashboard pages | live | document as normal workflow |
| core privacy records: data map, consent, dsr, notices, policies, training, breach | live dashboard pages | live | document as normal workflow |
| portal dashboard, cases, messages, invoices, compliance | live pages | live | document as normal workflow |
| governance core: entities, authority, board packs, resolutions, delegations | visible dashboard routes | live to partial | document what the current routes show and avoid invented approval depth |
| Information Officer and compliance health | visible dashboard routes | partial | document role expectations plus current route behavior only |
| PAIA manual, PAIA report, appeals | visible or referenced routes | partial | document carefully and avoid claiming full statutory lifecycle automation |
| privacy intelligence: sentinel, dsr factory, campaigns | visible dashboard routes | partial | treat as intelligence or review surfaces unless end-to-end workflow is proven |
| contract intelligence: heatmap, benchmarks, ai negotiator, order risk | visible dashboard routes | partial | document as review or assistant surfaces, not as guaranteed autonomous engines |
| diligence, tenders, disputes, remediation, enforcement risk, sector packs | visible dashboard routes | partial | document the current screen honestly and avoid pretending the full backlog exists |
| verification | visible dashboard routes | live to partial | document the current check surfaces and visible drill-down only |
| legacy admin and law apps | supporting repo surfaces | constraint | do not treat them as the main docs baseline unless the environment explicitly uses them |
| Information Regulator registration and wider IO filing obligations | register says missing | missing | do not document as a current system task |
What if the requirement sounds richer than the UI?
"The feedback says this should be a full governance platform"
Why this happens: The end-user feedback and requirement register describe a wider governance model than the currently confirmed dashboard and portal routes prove end to end.
Fix: Document the live route, note the partial state honestly, and do not invent missing user actions.
What's Next
Related Pages
- Running Admin and Governance Operations
- Using the VerityLaw Client Portal
- Module Manual Index
- Task Manual Index
SA Compliance Reference
- POPIA - governance and data subject rights duties still apply whether the product flow is complete or partial.
- PAIA - manual and access workflows should only be documented as live where current product support is confirmed.
Still Stuck?
- Search the VerityLaw help set.
- Use the support bot if your environment exposes it.
- Contact support:
support@veva.co.za
Was this page helpful? [Yes] [No]